Original Sinners

 

Humans are fundamentally depraved. They’re biologically and genetically defective on a profound level. People are dedicated to self-destruction and social destruction. And they’re quite effective at it. In many respects it’s a wonder they’re still even around.

But humans aren’t fully evil. The proof of this is humans are the dominant life form on the planet and they haven’t annihilated themselves yet. This doesn’t mean Big Brother, nuclear war, bio-chemical war, and extinction don’t loom. But they may well be avoided and defeated.

And even amidst loathsome mankind, living as a hermit isn’t good. Isolated mountains, woods, deserts, islands, and farms have a lot of appeal – especially with dogs and cats. But humans today have a lot to offer in the way of wealth, health care, technology, and culture. For all their wretched, disgusting, and absurd nature – for all their commitment to a lifestyle of irrationality, immorality, injustice, and betrayal – people still have by far the highest intelligence and knowledge of any creature on Earth. And they have the best esthetics and spirituality by a mile. So until decent android companions are built – especially female sex robots – the tiny number of relatively good and civilized people on this planet probably need to try hard to get along with their inferior insectoid monstrous fellow man.

Not For You

 

Liberalism is a systematic and comprehensive thought-system which highly accurately describes and explains the fundamental nature of reality, life, society, and Self. The philosophy of liberalism also delineates the most effective way to deal with them. Liberalism reveals to the individual how best to understand, manipulate, exploit, and enjoy reality; and how to optimally preserve, extend, and enhance his life. This philosophy also explains the ideal way to organize, harmonize and elevate society; finally, it tells the Sacred Self the most efficacious way to accomplish things, become great, experience pleasure, and be happy. It’s a magnificent system of ideas – the best ever created.

And in so many ways people don’t deserve it. However much all adults today suffered terribly in their childhood – and had their idealism stripped away and spirit crushed – due to a merciless upbringing of irrationality and injustice; now as free, independent, competently-functioning adults, they evidently have full control over their lives. And yet they still seem like deliberate and willful vermin. They evidently freely choose to reject most elements of liberal theory and live like hell. They seem to freely and purposely choose to waste and ruin their lives, and to abuse, attack, and betray their fellows. So the thought-system of liberalism seems too good for them. In fact, way too good.

People deserve Jesus and Marx. That’s pretty much all they’re good for. These are the only thinkers and philosophers they’re worthy of. Maybe throw in Berkeley, Hume, Kant, and Hegel.

Mankind is scum. People deserve to live like monkeys and monsters. Like fools and insects. Pain, suffering, and misery are their proper lot. Human beings merit no better. In fact, even ideologies like the above seem too good for them. Maybe try Mohammad and Mao.

The Catastrophe of 1868

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was outrageous and a disaster for America. It degraded and harmed the nation to an incredible degree. And America has never recovered from this abomination.

Yes, almost everyone in the country agreed that blacks -- after the Civil War ended in 1865 -- had the right to be free. But these backward and savage peoples had no right to live here – and far less to become citizens.

When the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, America was a radically pro-reason, pro-individualism, pro-liberty, pro-Enlightenment nation. Blacks profoundly opposed all of that. America back them was a fundamentally virtuous, hard-working, law-abiding, well-educated, English common law-based, Anglo-Saxon cultured, high-quality, civilized, noble country. Blacks were none of that. To allow these aliens, hostiles, and natural enemies of White and Western Civilization to stay inside the country, and even become citizens, was absurd and horrendous. This was treason and suicide for the Whites and America.

The undeniable truth is that blacks after the Civil War were just like blacks today: an extremely criminal and mendicant race of remarkable low sophistication, socialization, character, and virtue. Their intellectual, moral, and spiritual inferiority degraded the culture and quality of life profoundly. Blacks then – as now – hated political liberty, high civilization, and White society. And they were fundamentally unsuited to all three.

* * *

In the direct aftermath of the war, Senator Garrett Davis of Kentucky observed: “The Negro may be free, but he is not fit to be a citizen among us.” Congressman Samuel Randall of Pennsylvania noted: “Freedom does not make the Negro a citizen. He is unprepared for the ballot and unfit for political power.” The undeniable truth was, and is, as Senator William Saulsbury of Delaware pointed out: “You may free them, but you cannot make them equals in this Republic.”

It’s worth remembering that under all immigration and naturalization laws and standards in American history – at least until the 1965 nightmare of Hart-Celler – blacks were not in the least qualified to immigrate here or become rights-bearing citizens. Indeed, many Whites – such as from eastern and southern Europe – were also unqualified to reside inside or undergo naturalization.

In discussing and debating post-war Reconstruction policy, Congressman Andrew Rogers of New Jersey declared: “The Negro is not a citizen and never was. Freedom does not confer political rights.” Senator Thomas Hendricks of Indiana stated the obvious: “The Negro race is incapable of citizenship. Freedom is one thing; political equality is another.”

The inferiority of blacks to Whites was unambiguous and manifest to all, both then and now. Senator James Doolittle of Wisconsin put it simply: “Let him be free, but let him be removed from among us, for the races cannot live together in equality.” Nor in decent cooperation and harmony.

These truths were crystal clear in 1866, when all the above statements were made. They’re clear now too. With few exceptions, blacks have no right to live in America, and still less to become citizens, for the overwhelming reasons already stated, and because they hate Western Civilization, America, Enlightenment philosophy, political liberty, and White people. And because their menacing, disgusting, vile, monkey presence radically degrades American culture and quality of life.

Birthday 250

The main reason America declared independence 250 years ago is simple: no-one was going to deprive an Englishman of his rights – not even another Englishman. But there were other reasons too.

When Britain and America fought the French and Indians from 1754 to 1763, the soldiers of both nations were amazed, and even appalled, at how different they were. The two tribes had grown apart considerably since Jamestown and 1606.

Some of this was due to extreme geographical distance, as well as the much more pioneering, adventurous, and ambitious spirit of the colonists. Additionally, America had developed her nation and culture over a period of 150 years while free from powerful monarchy-based Royals and established-church Priests. So the separation of classes in the colonies was a small fraction of that of the United Kingdom. Moreover, Britain’s frankly-admitted policy of mercantilism – where the mother-country explicitly exploited, and benefited at the expense of, the 13 colonies – was increasingly resented and viewed as unjust and unnatural.

After the war ended, from the years 1763 to 1775, the British Parliament initiated something new and unwelcome. They passed a slew of tyrannical laws which enraged and alienated the Americans. Altho these measures often seemed reasonable and moderate to the British, in fact, they were not.

America joined the French and Indian War mainly to gain access to the farmland and resources across the Appalachian Mountains, but without being attacked by any Frenchmen or Indians. When Britain won the war and then legally forbade this in late 1763 the colonists were stunned. They felt betrayed and oppressed – and started to think in completely new ways. When Britain passed many other unprecedented and dictatorial acts, culminating in the 1774 openly-named Coercive Acts, that was that. The War for Independence was inevitable.

It needs to be noted that from 1763 to 1776 – and then to 1792 or so – America was an absolute intellectual ferment. The 13 North American colonies debated politics, and even philosophy, with a passion, and in a manner, previously unknown to man. And they drew conclusions of a similar type. As John Adams noted in a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1815, most of the American Revolution took place in the minds of Americans well before the War for Independence began.

One giant determination the outraged colonists made from 1763 to 1776 was: “Enough is enough.” There was no chance in hell the Americans would bow down to “taxation without representation”. Nor any form of British taxation. Nor any form of legislation by these absolute foreigners.

If America hadn’t declared independence in 1776, she would have done so in five or ten years maximum. If America had lost the War for Independence, she would have declared a second war in five or ten years maximum. Independence was a foregone conclusion by the late 1774 First Continental Congress in Philadelphia.

The bottom line was simple: no-one was going to deny an Englishman his rights – especially not a super-powered Englishman who understood, and believed in, liberty and the rights of man far better than just 14 years before.

Battle Royale

Ever since reason was discovered and invented in about 585 B.C. – that is, ever since strictly logical thought was successfully isolated from emotions, desires, drives, and instincts – the world has been a battleground between the forces of rationality and irrationality. This means an intellectual, psychological, legal, military, and otherwise war between those who search for, and obey, reason; and those who blithely ignore or brazenly reject it. This is the purest version of the eternal clash between good and evil.

This seminal reason vs. unreason philosophical conflict manifests itself culturally and societally in a battle between liberalism and illiberalism. This means the ideals of (1) realism, (2) rationality, (3) individualism, (4) liberty, (5) heroism, and (6) triumph; vs. the ideals of (1) subrealism and superrealism, (2) religion and nihilism, (3) altruism and collectivism, (4) fascism and socialism, (5) apathy and passivity, and (6) surrender and defeatism. This fundamental battle can also be described as the thought-system of straight-wing liberalism vs. that of right-wing reactionism and left-wing regressivism. This means: the magnificent ideology of progress and ascent vs. the ideology of a weak, sad, barbarous status quo vs. the ideology of a weaker and sadder retreat into even worse barbarism.

Clearly the Holy Individual and his derivative, supportive society needs to be as rational and liberal as possible. This is the way to maximum personal greatness and happiness, plus maximum social harmony and prosperity. Selfish pleasure, culturalism richness, and the victory of man demand rationality and liberalism.

The Heroes of All Time

 

White Supremacy and Patriarchy are magnificent. Obviously! No-one smart or good doubts this.

We need to support White Supremacy and Patriarchy in Western society as much as possible. All decent people need to defend, promote, and expand these concepts and ideals as widely and deeply as possible.

This is because Whites are by far the best race on the planet. And males are by far the best gender. They are our natural leaders. We need these two remarkable and heroic tribes to rescue us from our current hell and lead us to salvation. They’re pretty much the only ones who can.

One giant problem, however, is almost all people today define the terms “white supremacy” and “patriarchy” falsely and badly. They dishonestly and maliciously claim that “White Supremacy means lesser political rights for, and overall abuse of, non-Whites”. Similarly, they claim that “Patriarchy means lesser political rights for, and overall abuse of, women”.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The institutions and cultures of White Supremacy and Patriarchy absolutely acknowledge and respect the occasional goodness and greatness that coloreds and females sometimes bring to society. Proper White Supremacists and Patriarchists seek to raise these “minorities” – who make up over 95% of the world – as high as possible. But, at the same time, they also recognize how seriously and profoundly inferior colored people and females really are by nature and nurture.

Everyone knows how genuinely and amazingly good, great, and superior Whites and Males are. They’ve been this way for almost all of human history. Even today – despite 60 years of immense and merciless persecution – they still are.

White Supremacists and Patriarchists very much understand this comparative group magnificence and they focus on it in their sociology. They rightfully and admirably work hard to see that Whites and Males are nourished and cherished, so that they rise up powerfully and lead great lives. They know that these two are virtually the only ones who can lead humanity out of its current “multicultural”, “diverse”, “inclusive”, and “Woke” abyss. Only outstanding and wonderful white men can lift mankind above and beyond the current nightmare and into the sunlight of progress, brotherhood, happiness, and human magnificence.

The Rights of Man

 

Rights come from Nature – not god or government. Father Reality and Mother Nature create and enforce Natural Law. All living creatures and inanimate objects have to obey it. This includes all of mankind, now and forever.

Natural Law consists of such physical laws as gravity and electromagnetism. It consists of such chemical laws as matter can be neither created nor destroyed and standard water consists of 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen. It consists of such biological laws as cells are the basic unit of life and all species evolve. Reality and Nature even create and enforce such metaphysical laws as a thing is what it is (Law of Identity) and no thing can both be and not be at the same time (Law of Non-Contradiction). All life forms and lifeless objects must obey these laws.

Because all humans have to obey these laws too they must have full freedom to best conform to them. Then they can optimally manipulate their environment and themselves, and thus best live and thrive. Anything less than complete individual liberty objectively limits and harms them.

But people also have to obey human nature. Individuals have many objective biological needs and subjective personal wants. They need full freedom to achieve them and thus gain the highest quantity and quality of life.

Humans also have a social nature which they’re obliged to exist in conformity to. One massive part of it seems to be the absolute existential and even metaphysical equality of man. This results in an exact parallelism or equality of rights. No-one seems to have more rights than his fellows. Not even those of immense intellectual, moral, and spiritual superiority. Not even those who possess vastly more knowledge, wisdom, character, nobility, personal power, and social power than their fellows.

The only ostensible exceptions to these rules of Natural Law and Human Law are children, retards, lunatics, and animals. All other individuals seem to have an utter equality of rights. No-one, by right, is a natural or inherent master or slave. No-one, seemingly, can ever gain or merit such a status.

Individual rights are without restriction and extend to infinity – or at least as far as Father Reality and Mother Nature permit. The only valid and legitimate limitation to personal, social, and economic liberty is the Holy Individual may not violate the equal and limitless rights of his fellow man. It’s known that individual rights and liberties never conflict, clash, compete, or contradict. Rather, they always supplement, compliment, coincide, and reinforce. People must submit to and obey Natural Law and Human Law always.

Scum

 

Dictators are the scum of the earth. They should be systematically, vigorously, and immediately terminated wherever they exist. So too their cronies and principal supporters.

The governments ruled by them should experience an identical fate, if possible. Liberal states should be quickly erected in their place. But while they exist, no free or semi-free individual, group, business, society, nation, or government should associate with such slave masters and slave states. Such an act constitutes an immense and unspeakable crime. No political slave or good person can tolerate or forgive this act or its perpetrators.

Such felonious and heinous behavior converts the free or semi-free individual, group, business, society, nation, or government into accomplices of tyranny and evil. A free or semi-free people must never have personal, social, diplomatic, cultural, financial, or economic contact with this raw evil.

Supporting or appeasing slave drivers and their authoritarian regimes morally sanctions, politically props, and practically advances slavery, criminality, savagery, agony, misery, and depravity. It must never be done. 

Such anti-human activity helps the forces of evil maintain or expand their slave state. It’s a betrayal of, and treason to, the free or semi-free individuals, groups, businesses, societies, nations, and governments of the world. The monsters who do so are guilty of exceptional wickedness. They are themselves the scum of the earth and deserving of termination.

Citizenship

 

Every 3 to 5 years or so there needs to be a citizenship test for all Americans and other high-quality, relatively-liberal countries. If someone can’t pass it, they should be stripped of their citizenship and forcibly deported. This examination for national fitness might include:

* If someone commits a lot of crime, or goes on welfare a lot, he should be tossed out

* If someone scores low on intelligence or education tests, he should be tossed out

* If someone scores low on morality or culture tests, he should be tossed out

* If someone embraces a strikingly evil philosophy, like socialism or Islam, he should be tossed out 

* If someone can’t speak English properly, he should be tossed out

* If someone doesn’t: know the history of the country; or how the government works; or adopt its culture; or observe its holidays, traditions, and rituals; or love the White and Anglo-Saxon race; or fairly quickly integrate and assimilate into American society; and so on, he should be tossed out

* If someone doesn’t overall make the country better and stronger, by working hard and smart, and being a decent and good person, he should be tossed out

American and liberal citizenship is a privilege, not a right. You have to earn it.

The Fate of Man

 

When will mankind become rational? When will humans adopt a rational perspective and lifestyle, and then create a rational society and culture? Never. Never ever at all.

By 450 B.C. or so, the decently-educated Athenians and their leaders were fully aware that metaphysical perfection lie in realism and atheism. But they pretended to believe in mysticism and god anyway. By 1985 or so, the decently-educated Americans and their leaders were fully aware that political perfection lie in laissez-faire capitalism and libertarianism. But they pretended to believe in government interventionism and welfare statism anyway. The intellectual dishonesty and cowardice in both instances was effectively universal. And these absurd pantomimes and evil belief-systems persist all across Western Civilization to this day.

So mankind will never be rational or sensible. Human beings will never think or live in any way which is normal, natural, healthy, or happy. People have made their choices and that is that. Never ever will they deal with their mortality and liberty in any kind of honorable or noble manner. Indeed, in their selected way of life, you can’t even call humanity decent, acceptable, or tolerable. People are essentially disgusting insects and noxious vermin. And they always will be.

The philosophy of liberalism was invented, or at least initiated, around 2600 years ago. But a fully liberal society, culture, and lifestyle have never emerged, nor has mankind even come close. And we never will. At best a few scattered, heroic, liberal individuals may somehow rise from the muck and mire. But they’ll have to live out their precarious existences hated and hunted by all. And the species of man will never create a rational or liberal nation. No such “shining city on a hill” will ever exist.

What will happen, instead, is mankind will soon be rightfully and blissfully extincted. All humans will die out. They’ll be replaced by a hybrid species of homo simians and computers. Finally a life form will emerge which is rational and liberal.