In many or most respects, the
pre-inaugural Donald Trump is acting like a liberal hero. And America
and the world are treating him as such. But Trump knows little of
true liberalism; and he believes in and advocates it still less.
For
2600 years now life has been a battle between the liberals and the
illiberals. The philosophy and culture of liberalism rose under
Greece and Rome, but it declined under the Christian Dark Age.
Liberalism rose again during the Renaissance and Enlightenment, but
retreated during the current welfare statist Dark Age. The world
seemingly hit its liberal and civilizational nadir in the 1980s.
Then
came the liberal champions Deng Shiao-Ping of China, Mikhail Gorbachev of Russia, Margaret Thatcher of Britain, and Ronald Reagan
of America. These four remarkable individuals were both products of
the partial return of liberal philosophy and society, and drivers of
them. Underlying this minor ascent of man were such liberal
intellectuals as Frederich Bastiat, John Stuart Mill, Herbert
Spenser, Ludwig von Mises, Frederich Hayek, and, especially, Ayn
Rand.
Now
comes Donald Trump. Evidently he’s read a small amount of Rand, and
he even likes and agrees with her somewhat. But Trump is very shallow
and weak intellectually. His rather primitive, petty, and vulgar
lifestyle reveals and reflects this. Strategically and
psychologically, Trump may be “playing chess, while everyone else
is playing checkers” but on the deep and important issues, Trump is
mostly playing tic-tac-toe.
Yes,
Donald Trump has a rather dynamic and heroic persona and character.
He’s something of an alpha male leader. And it even seems like he
might emerge as something of an iconic, historic, and transformational figure. Let's hope!
But Trump is also a considerable liar and lowlife. And his main philosophy
– to the extent that he has one – is immensely amoral and
unprincipled. Trump is fundamentally a pragmatist and utilitarian.
Donald
Trump largely rejects right-wing religious conservatism and left-wing
collectivist progressivism. But that doesn’t make him a
straight-wing individualist liberal. He doesn’t even know what that
is! Generally, Trump leans to the contrarian, subversive right as he
keeps his distance from RINO, establishment, country-club, and swamp
Republicans. He's generally somewhat virtuous overall, and has good instincts, and is a political
natural. He’s also a nationalist, populist, and patriot. Trump also
favors and practices non-ideological deal-making, doing what works,
and common sense.
When
it comes to issues of philosophy and profound intellectualism, Donald
Trump rarely or never stands on principle. This is because he doesn’t
know many good principles and isn’t much aware of what’s right.
But Trump realizes this about himself -- which is a kind of strength.
He stands somewhat above Right and Left, and thus he has the ability
to pick out what's best from both and to somewhat transcend
them. This allows him to sometimes go moderately go in the
pro-realism, pro-reason, pro-individualism, pro-liberty, liberal
direction.
Ultimately,
Donald Trump from January 2025 to January 2029 -- assuming he
actually lives that long – isn’t likely to advance liberal
philosophy and civilization in America and the West that far. Not
even liberal politics. Under him, freedom will seemingly only rise
slightly -- if that.
This
is because Trump simply doesn’t believe in getting rid of fascist
drug, prostitution, gambling, and early-abortion prohibitions. He
doesn’t believe in eliminating fascist labor laws, business
permits, and professional licenses. He doesn’t believe in
terminating socialist Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare,
Food Stamps, and housing subsidies. He doesn’t believe in
privatizing socialist roads, parks, schools, mail, and money. All of
this Donald Trump sees as a species of madness. Political liberalism
and libertarianism are ideals he fundamentally opposes.
At
best, Trump might cut crime a bit, somewhat deregulate the economy,
partially free up the energy industries, deport a moderate amount of illegal
aliens, and occasionally stand up for America against enemies like
China, Russia, Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. But
Trump is a total welfare statist. His foreign policy is one of
engaging with and appeasing evil; he doesn’t believe in victory.
His domestic policy is one of coercion and regulation; rhetoric
aside, he doesn’t believe in freedom. Trump strongly rejects free
statism, economic laissez-faire capitalism, social libertarianism,
personal liberty, and political liberalism. And he may well spend
like a drunken sailor and get us into some pointless wars.
If
someone were to walk up to Donald Trump and quietly point out that
the purpose of gov’t is to uphold individual rights, establish
liberty and justice for all, protect people and property, prevent the
initiation of force, and create a socio-economic system of pure
freedom...he wouldn’t know what the hell you were talking about.
All of this is alien to his notions of gov't.
Still,
political leaders adapt. They improvise and adjust themselves to the
times, social situations, cultural trends, and changing intellectual
beliefs. They tend to comply with what the masses and elites demand
of them. Maybe the leading thinkers of America and the West can
somewhat force Trump away from Big Brother and in the direction of
freedom. By far the best hope for political liberalization on the
planet today is Argentina’s Javier Milei. Maybe from afar Trump can
observe and learn from him. Or maybe Milei can personally talk to
Trump and influence him directly.
Ultimately,
it’s up to the intellectual leaders of the Atlas Society,
Objective Standards Institute, Ayn Rand Institute, Cato
Institute, Reason magazine, and others to get to work and
try to intellectually persuade and personally push Donald Trump in
the liberal philosophical and political direction. More important
than this, liberal thinkers need to continue to try to win the
philosophical battles in the intellectual journals, think-tanks, and
elite universities. This will eventually touch Trump, and all the
political leaders of the world which follow.