Stupid Slimy Loser Failure Nation

 

Now that the 9/11 anniversary is long over -- and people have a better opportunity to be calm and think rationally, clearly, and wisely -- I really wonder:

A whopping 25 years after the World Trade Center Massacre, why haven’t Mecca and Medina been nuked? Why haven’t the moslem dictatorships of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Turkey, and Pakistan been overthrown and liberated? Why hasn’t America taken back the oil "nationalized" and stolen from it? Why hasn't the philosophy of islam been intellectually refuted, morally condemned, publicly hated, and virulently attacked by all? Why haven’t virtually all moslems been banned and deported?

Because America is a failed state. Because America is a sissyboy-faggot nation. Because America is a stupid, slimy, self-hating, self-destroying country and people which militantly refuses to stand up for or defend itself, and which is fanatically committed to self-immolation and suicide.

America was founded as a liberal nation. It was based upon liberal philosophy and 1700s Enlightenment values. These ideas created the most liberal society and civilization in the history of man. They created the greatest and most noble and exalted nation ever.

But America is mostly illiberal now. Especially intellectually. Its philosophy and culture are radically diminished from its founding. Yes, many liberal institutions and practices still remain; but this is mostly based upon old and mindless habits which are dying out.

America is no longer much guided by the metaphysics of realism, naturalism, and objective reality. Nor the epistemology of reason, science, and logic. Nor the ethics of individualism, self-interest, and personal happiness. Nor the politics of individual rights, justice, and liberty. America’s intellectual leaders and the masses now mostly reject and oppose these liberal ideals.

Maybe America should replace its motto "E pluribus unum" with "Allah akbar". Maybe illiberal, self-hating, self-destroying America should finish the job the evil moslem martyrs started 25 years ago.

Citizenship Revolution

 

America and the West mostly need a revolution in philosophy – a movement toward liberalism. But even a more modest revolution in politics would be hugely helpful – a movement toward libertarianism and capitalism. Finally, even a relatively tiny revolution in citizenship would uplift us substantially. The immigration and naturalization processes of America and the West have done significant damage over the past 60 years or so. The demographics of Western Civilization have been radically degraded.

The clear and undeniable truth is: People of low intellectual, moral, spiritual, educational, cultural, and civilizational quality have had a terrible impact on us. They need to be kept and kicked out. Conversely, those of high quality can help out a lot. They need to be retained and recruited in.

Even if someone is a tenth-generation American, Briton, or German, if he significantly degrades the society, and lowers its quality of life, he needs to be stripped of citizenship and deported. This means: 1) if he begs or steals a lot; 2) if he’s low in character or morals; 3) if he’s inferior in intelligence or education; 4) if he’s incompetent or lazy at work; 5) if he dislikes the people or mores of his country; 6) if he’s highly nihilistic, supernaturalist, sacrificial, or statist; 7) if he’s some deadly combination of these...then he needs to be removed from the population. 

But if someone from the other side of the world -- who has no contact with America or the Western nations -- is the diametric opposite of this, then he needs to be sought out and induced to join up. High value people are important to the lifeblood of a nation!

And if this new policy means far fewer blacks, browns, and moslems in America and the West – as seems likely -- then so be it. It isn’t bigotry, racism, nativism, or xenophobia to care about personal quality. So to all the low, dumb, feckless, destructive, or traitorous blacks, browns, and moslems out there: Good-bye and good riddance! Don’t let the door hit you in your inferior ass on the way out!

As for all the seemingly superior Indians, Oriental, and Jews out there, who score better than Whites on intelligence and achievement tests, and get into more elite colleges, and make more money, and commit fewer crimes, and go on the dole less: Welcome. We couldn’t be happier to have you!

But if you’re excessively collectivist; and refuse to assimilate and integrate into Western society; and heavily stay in your physical, mental, racial, and cultural ghettos; and overly support political tyranny...you might get deported as well. White people in America and the Western nations generally believe in universalism, rationality, individualism, liberty, and liberalism. You better too.

Strategy

 

The universe as we know it is inconceivably big and inconceivably old. And the Earth seems to be remarkably unremarkable, with facsimiles of it virtually everywhere. So the notion that Earth is special or unique, and that sentient life exists on it and nowhere else, simply defies belief. Almost beyond a doubt sentient and super-sentient life forms are close to everywhere. But if they don’t contact humanity, or even allow their existences to be known, this is almost certainly because they virtuously and wisely choose this.

SuSents [super-sentient creatures] extremely likely find humans uninteresting, just as humans find grossly inferior life forms – such as individual isolated bacteria colonies -- also uninteresting. SuSents very probably also find humans unworthy and contemptible due to their extreme illiberalism, irrationality, immorality, and self-destructionism.

Still, individual great humans of relatively high liberalism, rationality, morality, and self-cherishment may indeed seem slightly interesting and worthy to these amazingly superior and godlike life forms. So if you want to undergo extreme rejuvenation or live forever – which they can almost certainly make happen – then you need to try to come up to their standards. They might discretely reward you!

But it seems highly unlikely you would ever “ascend to heaven” while many people watch. No human seems to have accomplished this so far. But perhaps the ultra-observant and immensely just SuSents will quietly swoop in – just as you perish – and secretly preserve your consciousness while they lift you to far better cosmic realm. Your new best friends might maintain or improve your essential self and consciousness while supplying you with a new and enhanced body to enjoy and exploit in your wondrous and heavenly afterlife.

So we all really need to get to work impressing these guys!

Battle Royale

 

Every since reason was discovered and invented in about 585 B.C. -- that is, ever since strictly logical thought was successfully isolated from emotions, desires, drives, and instincts -- the world has been a battleground between the forces of rationality and irrationality. This means an intellectual, psychological, legal, military, and otherwise war between those who search for and obey reason and those who blithely ignore or brazenly reject it. This is the purest version of the eternal clash between good and evil.

This seminal reason vs. unreason philosophical conflict manifests itself culturally and societally in a battle between liberalism and illiberalism. This means -- roughly speaking -- the ideals of (1) rationality, (2) individualism, (3) liberty, (4) heroism, and (5) triumph vs. the ideals of (1) religion and nihilism, (2) altruism and collectivism, (3) fascism and socialism, (4) apathy and passivity, and (5) surrender and defeatism. This fundamental battle can also be described as the thought-system of up-wing individualist liberalism vs. that of right-wing religious reactionism and left-wing collectivist regressivism. This means: the magnificent ideology of progress and ascent vs. the dreadful ideology of a weak, sad, barbarous, status quo and another dreadful ideology of a weaker and sadder retreat into even worse barbarism.

Clearly the Holy Individual and his complimentary, supportive society need to be as rational and liberal as possible. This is the way to maximize personal greatness and happiness, plus social harmony and prosperity. Selfish pleasure, collective prosperity, cultural richness, and the victory of man demand rationality and liberalism.

Filling the God-Hole

 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Russell Brand, Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson, and Peter Thiel are all relatively brave, honest, and noble souls that since 2024 or so have failed badly in their lives. All five – and other prominent ones too – have turned rather seriously to the false and evil philosophy of Christianity. They seemingly tried hard to live a rational life and follow a rational philosophy – and certainly they were successful by many standards – but in the end it evidently didn’t fully work out and they weren’t entirely satisfied with their “secularism”. These five relatively high-quality thinkers and magnificent achievers simply couldn’t “fill their god-hole” with anything better than this Jesus drivel.

But the fact is you’re supposed to fill this psychological “hole” with reality and the cosmos. You’re supposed to fill this emptiness with real spirituality and transcendence. Not the fake, malicious, alien, vacuous, supernatural kind. You need to live with inspiration, uplift, beauty, heroism, and nobility in your life, yes. But you also need your eyes wide open and your brain thinking clearly, quickly, deeply, and accurately. You need to seek the absolute, objective truth – as much as you can find – and then try to live in accord with it.

But “god” isn’t the way. The reality of true and good philosophy is that man is a magnificent and ascent creature, and thus in many respects you must be your own god. You must become your own hero, noble soul, and “thing above and beyond the self”.

This is challenging, yes. But so is all of life. You can’t escape it. And living like this – without crutches or blindness – is highly rewarding. Such a lifestyle is also what reality, reason, human nature, magnificence, and happiness demand.

As a self-created individual and properly rational human being you must find and create your own meaning and purpose in life. This activity makes you great, admirable, and a bit like a god yourself. It’s a wonderful way to live.

It helps to remember that your indisputable, fundamental purpose in life is to maximize your potential and fulfill your destiny. Raise your quantity and quality of life to the highest level you can. Mother Nature and Father Reality – who rule all – ask that you uphold a mighty standard and become as great as possible while achieving as much as possible.

Of course, you shouldn’t work yourself to death or utter exhaustion. You must have, and have a right to have, a lot of fun and pleasure along the way. Life is a journey with plenty of rest stops and moments of relaxation and enjoyment. People need a good work/play/rest balance in their lives.

But as a natural hero and noble soul you do continually look upward and aim high. You try to live forever and become godlike in your knowledge and powers – however impossible this may be. All of these are noble and exalted goals and ideals to have, and constitute a fantastic and magnificent way to live.

Original Sinners

 

Humans are fundamentally depraved. They’re biologically and genetically defective on a profound level. People are dedicated to self-destruction and social destruction. And they’re quite effective at it. In many respects it’s a wonder they’re still even around.

But humans aren’t fully evil. The proof of this is humans are the dominant life form on the planet and they haven’t annihilated themselves yet. This doesn’t mean Big Brother, nuclear war, bio-chemical war, and extinction don’t loom. But they may well be avoided and defeated.

And even amidst loathsome mankind, living as a hermit isn’t good. Isolated mountains, woods, deserts, islands, and farms have a lot of appeal – especially with dogs and cats. But humans today have a lot to offer in the way of wealth, health care, technology, and culture. For all their wretched, disgusting, and absurd nature – for all their commitment to a lifestyle of irrationality, immorality, injustice, and betrayal – people still have by far the highest intelligence and knowledge of any creature on Earth. And they have the best esthetics and spirituality by a mile. So until decent android companions are built – especially female sex robots – the tiny number of relatively good and civilized people on this planet probably need to try hard to get along with their inferior insectoid monstrous fellow man.

Not For You

 

Liberalism is a systematic and comprehensive thought-system which highly accurately describes and explains the fundamental nature of reality, life, society, and Self. The philosophy of liberalism also delineates the most effective way to deal with them. Liberalism reveals to the individual how best to understand, manipulate, exploit, and enjoy reality; and how to optimally preserve, extend, and enhance his life. This philosophy also explains the ideal way to organize, harmonize and elevate society; finally, it tells the Sacred Self the most efficacious way to accomplish things, become great, experience pleasure, and be happy. It’s a magnificent system of ideas – the best ever created.

And in so many ways people don’t deserve it. However much all adults today suffered terribly in their childhood – and had their idealism stripped away and spirit crushed – due to a merciless upbringing of irrationality and injustice; now as free, independent, competently-functioning adults, they evidently have full control over their lives. And yet they still seem like deliberate and willful vermin. They evidently freely choose to reject most elements of liberal theory and live like hell. They seem to freely and purposely choose to waste and ruin their lives, and to abuse, attack, and betray their fellows. So the thought-system of liberalism seems too good for them. In fact, way too good.

People deserve Jesus and Marx. That’s pretty much all they’re good for. These are the only thinkers and philosophers they’re worthy of. Maybe throw in Berkeley, Hume, Kant, and Hegel.

Mankind is scum. People deserve to live like monkeys and monsters. Like fools and insects. Pain, suffering, and misery are their proper lot. Human beings merit no better. In fact, even ideologies like the above seem too good for them. Maybe try Mohammad and Mao.

The Catastrophe of 1868

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was outrageous and a disaster for America. It degraded and harmed the nation to an incredible degree. And America has never recovered from this abomination.

Yes, almost everyone in the country agreed that blacks -- after the Civil War ended in 1865 -- had the right to be free. But these backward and savage peoples had no right to live here – and far less to become citizens.

When the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, America was a radically pro-reason, pro-individualism, pro-liberty, pro-Enlightenment nation. Blacks profoundly opposed all of that. America back them was a fundamentally virtuous, hard-working, law-abiding, well-educated, English common law-based, Anglo-Saxon cultured, high-quality, civilized, noble country. Blacks were none of that. To allow these aliens, hostiles, and natural enemies of White and Western Civilization to stay inside the country, and even become citizens, was absurd and horrendous. This was treason and suicide for the Whites and America.

The undeniable truth is that blacks after the Civil War were just like blacks today: an extremely criminal and mendicant race of remarkable low sophistication, socialization, character, and virtue. Their intellectual, moral, and spiritual inferiority degraded the culture and quality of life profoundly. Blacks then – as now – hated political liberty, high civilization, and White society. And they were fundamentally unsuited to all three.

* * *

In the direct aftermath of the war, Senator Garrett Davis of Kentucky observed: “The Negro may be free, but he is not fit to be a citizen among us.” Congressman Samuel Randall of Pennsylvania noted: “Freedom does not make the Negro a citizen. He is unprepared for the ballot and unfit for political power.” The undeniable truth was, and is, as Senator William Saulsbury of Delaware pointed out: “You may free them, but you cannot make them equals in this Republic.”

It’s worth remembering that under all immigration and naturalization laws and standards in American history – at least until the 1965 nightmare of Hart-Celler – blacks were not in the least qualified to immigrate here or become rights-bearing citizens. Indeed, many Whites – such as from eastern and southern Europe – were also unqualified to reside inside or undergo naturalization.

In discussing and debating post-war Reconstruction policy, Congressman Andrew Rogers of New Jersey declared: “The Negro is not a citizen and never was. Freedom does not confer political rights.” Senator Thomas Hendricks of Indiana stated the obvious: “The Negro race is incapable of citizenship. Freedom is one thing; political equality is another.”

The inferiority of blacks to Whites was unambiguous and manifest to all, both then and now. Senator James Doolittle of Wisconsin put it simply: “Let him be free, but let him be removed from among us, for the races cannot live together in equality.” Nor in decent cooperation and harmony.

These truths were crystal clear in 1866, when all the above statements were made. They’re clear now too. With few exceptions, blacks have no right to live in America, and still less to become citizens, for the overwhelming reasons already stated, and because they hate Western Civilization, America, Enlightenment philosophy, political liberty, and White people. And because their menacing, disgusting, vile, monkey presence radically degrades American culture and quality of life.

Birthday 250

The main reason America declared independence 250 years ago is simple: no-one was going to deprive an Englishman of his rights – not even another Englishman. But there were other reasons too.

When Britain and America fought the French and Indians from 1754 to 1763, the soldiers of both nations were amazed, and even appalled, at how different they were. The two tribes had grown apart considerably since Jamestown and 1606.

Some of this was due to extreme geographical distance, as well as the much more pioneering, adventurous, and ambitious spirit of the colonists. Additionally, America had developed her nation and culture over a period of 150 years while free from powerful monarchy-based Royals and established-church Priests. So the separation of classes in the colonies was a small fraction of that of the United Kingdom. Moreover, Britain’s frankly-admitted policy of mercantilism – where the mother-country explicitly exploited, and benefited at the expense of, the 13 colonies – was increasingly resented and viewed as unjust and unnatural.

After the war ended, from the years 1763 to 1775, the British Parliament initiated something new and unwelcome. They passed a slew of tyrannical laws which enraged and alienated the Americans. Altho these measures often seemed reasonable and moderate to the British, in fact, they were not.

America joined the French and Indian War mainly to gain access to the farmland and resources across the Appalachian Mountains, but without being attacked by any Frenchmen or Indians. When Britain won the war and then legally forbade this in late 1763 the colonists were stunned. They felt betrayed and oppressed – and started to think in completely new ways. When Britain passed many other unprecedented and dictatorial acts, culminating in the 1774 openly-named Coercive Acts, that was that. The War for Independence was inevitable.

It needs to be noted that from 1763 to 1776 – and then to 1792 or so – America was an absolute intellectual ferment. The 13 North American colonies debated politics, and even philosophy, with a passion, and in a manner, previously unknown to man. And they drew conclusions of a similar type. As John Adams noted in a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1815, most of the American Revolution took place in the minds of Americans well before the War for Independence began.

One giant determination the outraged colonists made from 1763 to 1776 was: “Enough is enough.” There was no chance in hell the Americans would bow down to “taxation without representation”. Nor any form of British taxation. Nor any form of legislation by these absolute foreigners.

If America hadn’t declared independence in 1776, she would have done so in five or ten years maximum. If America had lost the War for Independence, she would have declared a second war in five or ten years maximum. Independence was a foregone conclusion by the late 1774 First Continental Congress in Philadelphia.

The bottom line was simple: no-one was going to deny an Englishman his rights – especially not a super-powered Englishman who understood, and believed in, liberty and the rights of man far better than just 14 years before.

Battle Royale

Ever since reason was discovered and invented in about 585 B.C. – that is, ever since strictly logical thought was successfully isolated from emotions, desires, drives, and instincts – the world has been a battleground between the forces of rationality and irrationality. This means an intellectual, psychological, legal, military, and otherwise war between those who search for, and obey, reason; and those who blithely ignore or brazenly reject it. This is the purest version of the eternal clash between good and evil.

This seminal reason vs. unreason philosophical conflict manifests itself culturally and societally in a battle between liberalism and illiberalism. This means the ideals of (1) realism, (2) rationality, (3) individualism, (4) liberty, (5) heroism, and (6) triumph; vs. the ideals of (1) subrealism and superrealism, (2) religion and nihilism, (3) altruism and collectivism, (4) fascism and socialism, (5) apathy and passivity, and (6) surrender and defeatism. This fundamental battle can also be described as the thought-system of straight-wing liberalism vs. that of right-wing reactionism and left-wing regressivism. This means: the magnificent ideology of progress and ascent vs. the ideology of a weak, sad, barbarous status quo vs. the ideology of a weaker and sadder retreat into even worse barbarism.

Clearly the Holy Individual and his derivative, supportive society needs to be as rational and liberal as possible. This is the way to maximum personal greatness and happiness, plus maximum social harmony and prosperity. Selfish pleasure, culturalism richness, and the victory of man demand rationality and liberalism.