The Catastrophe of 1868

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was outrageous and a disaster for America. It degraded and harmed the nation to an incredible degree. And America has never recovered from this abomination.

Yes, almost everyone in the country agreed that blacks -- after the Civil War ended in 1865 -- had the right to be free. But these backward and savage peoples had no right to live here – and far less to become citizens.

When the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, America was a radically pro-reason, pro-individualism, pro-liberty, pro-Enlightenment nation. Blacks profoundly opposed all of that. America back them was a fundamentally virtuous, hard-working, law-abiding, well-educated, English common law-based, Anglo-Saxon cultured, high-quality, civilized, noble country. Blacks were none of that. To allow these aliens, hostiles, and natural enemies of White and Western Civilization to stay inside the country, and even become citizens, was absurd and horrendous. This was treason and suicide for the Whites and America.

The undeniable truth is that blacks after the Civil War were just like blacks today: an extremely criminal and mendicant race of remarkable low sophistication, socialization, character, and virtue. Their intellectual, moral, and spiritual inferiority degraded the culture and quality of life profoundly. Blacks then – as now – hated political liberty, high civilization, and White society. And they were fundamentally unsuited to all three.

* * *

In the direct aftermath of the war, Senator Garrett Davis of Kentucky observed: “The Negro may be free, but he is not fit to be a citizen among us.” Congressman Samuel Randall of Pennsylvania noted: “Freedom does not make the Negro a citizen. He is unprepared for the ballot and unfit for political power.” The undeniable truth was, and is, as Senator William Saulsbury of Delaware pointed out: “You may free them, but you cannot make them equals in this Republic.”

It’s worth remembering that under all immigration and naturalization laws and standards in American history – at least until the 1965 nightmare of Hart-Celler – blacks were not in the least qualified to immigrate here or become rights-bearing citizens. Indeed, many Whites – such as from eastern and southern Europe – were also unqualified to reside inside or undergo naturalization.

In discussing and debating post-war Reconstruction policy, Congressman Andrew Rogers of New Jersey declared: “The Negro is not a citizen and never was. Freedom does not confer political rights.” Senator Thomas Hendricks of Indiana stated the obvious: “The Negro race is incapable of citizenship. Freedom is one thing; political equality is another.”

The inferiority of blacks to Whites was unambiguous and manifest to all, both then and now. Senator James Doolittle of Wisconsin put it simply: “Let him be free, but let him be removed from among us, for the races cannot live together in equality.” Nor in decent cooperation and harmony.

These truths were crystal clear in 1866, when all the above statements were made. They’re clear now too. With few exceptions, blacks have no right to live in America, and still less to become citizens, for the overwhelming reasons already stated, and because they hate Western Civilization, America, Enlightenment philosophy, political liberty, and White people. And because their menacing, disgusting, vile, monkey presence radically degrades American culture and quality of life.

Birthday 250

The main reason America declared independence 250 years ago is simple: no-one was going to deprive an Englishman of his rights – not even another Englishman. But there were other reasons too.

When Britain and America fought the French and Indians from 1754 to 1763, the soldiers of both nations were amazed, and even appalled, at how different they were. The two tribes had grown apart considerably since Jamestown and 1606.

Some of this was due to extreme geographical distance, as well as the much more pioneering, adventurous, and ambitious spirit of the colonists. Additionally, America had developed her nation and culture over a period of 150 years while free from powerful monarchy-based Royals and established-church Priests. So the separation of classes in the colonies was a small fraction of that of the United Kingdom. Moreover, Britain’s frankly-admitted policy of mercantilism – where the mother-country explicitly exploited, and benefited at the expense of, the 13 colonies – was increasingly resented and viewed as unjust and unnatural.

After the war ended, from the years 1763 to 1775, the British Parliament initiated something new and unwelcome. They passed a slew of tyrannical laws which enraged and alienated the Americans. Altho these measures often seemed reasonable and moderate to the British, in fact, they were not.

America joined the French and Indian War mainly to gain access to the farmland and resources across the Appalachian Mountains, but without being attacked by any Frenchmen or Indians. When Britain won the war and then legally forbade this in late 1763 the colonists were stunned. They felt betrayed and oppressed – and started to think in completely new ways. When Britain passed many other unprecedented and dictatorial acts, culminating in the 1774 openly-named Coercive Acts, that was that. The War for Independence was inevitable.

It needs to be noted that from 1763 to 1776 – and then to 1792 or so – America was an absolute intellectual ferment. The 13 North American colonies debated politics, and even philosophy, with a passion, and in a manner, previously unknown to man. And they drew conclusions of a similar type. As John Adams noted in a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1815, most of the American Revolution took place in the minds of Americans well before the War for Independence began.

One giant determination the outraged colonists made from 1763 to 1776 was: “Enough is enough.” There was no chance in hell the Americans would bow down to “taxation without representation”. Nor any form of British taxation. Nor any form of legislation by these absolute foreigners.

If America hadn’t declared independence in 1776, she would have done so in five or ten years maximum. If America had lost the War for Independence, she would have declared a second war in five or ten years maximum. Independence was a foregone conclusion by the late 1774 First Continental Congress in Philadelphia.

The bottom line was simple: no-one was going to deny an Englishman his rights – especially not a super-powered Englishman who understood, and believed in, liberty and the rights of man far better than just 14 years before.

Battle Royale

Ever since reason was discovered and invented in about 585 B.C. – that is, ever since strictly logical thought was successfully isolated from emotions, desires, drives, and instincts – the world has been a battleground between the forces of rationality and irrationality. This means an intellectual, psychological, legal, military, and otherwise war between those who search for, and obey, reason; and those who blithely ignore or brazenly reject it. This is the purest version of the eternal clash between good and evil.

This seminal reason vs. unreason philosophical conflict manifests itself culturally and societally in a battle between liberalism and illiberalism. This means the ideals of (1) realism, (2) rationality, (3) individualism, (4) liberty, (5) heroism, and (6) triumph; vs. the ideals of (1) subrealism and superrealism, (2) religion and nihilism, (3) altruism and collectivism, (4) fascism and socialism, (5) apathy and passivity, and (6) surrender and defeatism. This fundamental battle can also be described as the thought-system of straight-wing liberalism vs. that of right-wing reactionism and left-wing regressivism. This means: the magnificent ideology of progress and ascent vs. the ideology of a weak, sad, barbarous status quo vs. the ideology of a weaker and sadder retreat into even worse barbarism.

Clearly the Holy Individual and his derivative, supportive society needs to be as rational and liberal as possible. This is the way to maximum personal greatness and happiness, plus maximum social harmony and prosperity. Selfish pleasure, culturalism richness, and the victory of man demand rationality and liberalism.

The Heroes of All Time

 

White Supremacy and Patriarchy are magnificent. Obviously! No-one smart or good doubts this.

We need to support White Supremacy and Patriarchy in Western society as much as possible. All decent people need to defend, promote, and expand these concepts and ideals as widely and deeply as possible.

This is because Whites are by far the best race on the planet. And males are by far the best gender. They are our natural leaders. We need these two remarkable and heroic tribes to rescue us from our current hell and lead us to salvation. They’re pretty much the only ones who can.

One giant problem, however, is almost all people today define the terms “white supremacy” and “patriarchy” falsely and badly. They dishonestly and maliciously claim that “White Supremacy means lesser political rights for, and overall abuse of, non-Whites”. Similarly, they claim that “Patriarchy means lesser political rights for, and overall abuse of, women”.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The institutions and cultures of White Supremacy and Patriarchy absolutely acknowledge and respect the occasional goodness and greatness that coloreds and females sometimes bring to society. Proper White Supremacists and Patriarchists seek to raise these “minorities” – who make up over 95% of the world – as high as possible. But, at the same time, they also recognize how seriously and profoundly inferior colored people and females really are by nature and nurture.

Everyone knows how genuinely and amazingly good, great, and superior Whites and Males are. They’ve been this way for almost all of human history. Even today – despite 60 years of immense and merciless persecution – they still are.

White Supremacists and Patriarchists very much understand this comparative group magnificence and they focus on it in their sociology. They rightfully and admirably work hard to see that Whites and Males are nourished and cherished, so that they rise up powerfully and lead great lives. They know that these two are virtually the only ones who can lead humanity out of its current “multicultural”, “diverse”, “inclusive”, and “Woke” abyss. Only outstanding and wonderful white men can lift mankind above and beyond the current nightmare and into the sunlight of progress, brotherhood, happiness, and human magnificence.

The Rights of Man

 

Rights come from Nature – not god or government. Father Reality and Mother Nature create and enforce Natural Law. All living creatures and inanimate objects have to obey it. This includes all of mankind, now and forever.

Natural Law consists of such physical laws as gravity and electromagnetism. It consists of such chemical laws as matter can be neither created nor destroyed and standard water consists of 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen. It consists of such biological laws as cells are the basic unit of life and all species evolve. Reality and Nature even create and enforce such metaphysical laws as a thing is what it is (Law of Identity) and no thing can both be and not be at the same time (Law of Non-Contradiction). All life forms and lifeless objects must obey these laws.

Because all humans have to obey these laws too they must have full freedom to best conform to them. Then they can optimally manipulate their environment and themselves, and thus best live and thrive. Anything less than complete individual liberty objectively limits and harms them.

But people also have to obey human nature. Individuals have many objective biological needs and subjective personal wants. They need full freedom to achieve them and thus gain the highest quantity and quality of life.

Humans also have a social nature which they’re obliged to exist in conformity to. One massive part of it seems to be the absolute existential and even metaphysical equality of man. This results in an exact parallelism or equality of rights. No-one seems to have more rights than his fellows. Not even those of immense intellectual, moral, and spiritual superiority. Not even those who possess vastly more knowledge, wisdom, character, nobility, personal power, and social power than their fellows.

The only ostensible exceptions to these rules of Natural Law and Human Law are children, retards, lunatics, and animals. All other individuals seem to have an utter equality of rights. No-one, by right, is a natural or inherent master or slave. No-one, seemingly, can ever gain or merit such a status.

Individual rights are without restriction and extend to infinity – or at least as far as Father Reality and Mother Nature permit. The only valid and legitimate limitation to personal, social, and economic liberty is the Holy Individual may not violate the equal and limitless rights of his fellow man. It’s known that individual rights and liberties never conflict, clash, compete, or contradict. Rather, they always supplement, compliment, coincide, and reinforce. People must submit to and obey Natural Law and Human Law always.

Scum

 

Dictators are the scum of the earth. They should be systematically, vigorously, and immediately terminated wherever they exist. So too their cronies and principal supporters.

The governments ruled by them should experience an identical fate, if possible. Liberal states should be quickly erected in their place. But while they exist, no free or semi-free individual, group, business, society, nation, or government should associate with such slave masters and slave states. Such an act constitutes an immense and unspeakable crime. No political slave or good person can tolerate or forgive this act or its perpetrators.

Such felonious and heinous behavior converts the free or semi-free individual, group, business, society, nation, or government into accomplices of tyranny and evil. A free or semi-free people must never have personal, social, diplomatic, cultural, financial, or economic contact with this raw evil.

Supporting or appeasing slave drivers and their authoritarian regimes morally sanctions, politically props, and practically advances slavery, criminality, savagery, agony, misery, and depravity. It must never be done. 

Such anti-human activity helps the forces of evil maintain or expand their slave state. It’s a betrayal of, and treason to, the free or semi-free individuals, groups, businesses, societies, nations, and governments of the world. The monsters who do so are guilty of exceptional wickedness. They are themselves the scum of the earth and deserving of termination.

Citizenship

 

Every 3 to 5 years or so there needs to be a citizenship test for all Americans and other high-quality, relatively-liberal countries. If someone can’t pass it, they should be stripped of their citizenship and forcibly deported. This examination for national fitness might include:

* If someone commits a lot of crime, or goes on welfare a lot, he should be tossed out

* If someone scores low on intelligence or education tests, he should be tossed out

* If someone scores low on morality or culture tests, he should be tossed out

* If someone embraces a strikingly evil philosophy, like socialism or Islam, he should be tossed out 

* If someone can’t speak English properly, he should be tossed out

* If someone doesn’t: know the history of the country; or how the government works; or adopt its culture; or observe its holidays, traditions, and rituals; or love the White and Anglo-Saxon race; or fairly quickly integrate and assimilate into American society; and so on, he should be tossed out

* If someone doesn’t overall make the country better and stronger, by working hard and smart, and being a decent and good person, he should be tossed out

American and liberal citizenship is a privilege, not a right. You have to earn it.

The Fate of Man

 

When will mankind become rational? When will humans adopt a rational perspective and lifestyle, and then create a rational society and culture? Never. Never ever at all.

By 450 B.C. or so, the decently-educated Athenians and their leaders were fully aware that metaphysical perfection lie in realism and atheism. But they pretended to believe in mysticism and god anyway. By 1985 or so, the decently-educated Americans and their leaders were fully aware that political perfection lie in laissez-faire capitalism and libertarianism. But they pretended to believe in government interventionism and welfare statism anyway. The intellectual dishonesty and cowardice in both instances was effectively universal. And these absurd pantomimes and evil belief-systems persist all across Western Civilization to this day.

So mankind will never be rational or sensible. Human beings will never think or live in any way which is normal, natural, healthy, or happy. People have made their choices and that is that. Never ever will they deal with their mortality and liberty in any kind of honorable or noble manner. Indeed, in their selected way of life, you can’t even call humanity decent, acceptable, or tolerable. People are essentially disgusting insects and noxious vermin. And they always will be.

The philosophy of liberalism was invented, or at least initiated, around 2600 years ago. But a fully liberal society, culture, and lifestyle have never emerged, nor has mankind even come close. And we never will. At best a few scattered, heroic, liberal individuals may somehow rise from the muck and mire. But they’ll have to live out their precarious existences hated and hunted by all. And the species of man will never create a rational or liberal nation. No such “shining city on a hill” will ever exist.

What will happen, instead, is mankind will soon be rightfully and blissfully extincted. All humans will die out. They’ll be replaced by a hybrid species of homo simians and computers. Finally a life form will emerge which is rational and liberal.

War

 

There are many types and levels of war. Some are rather mild while others are quite severe. The main ones are as follows:

1) Firstly, one nation can seize or “nationalize” some of the resources of another. This theft includes major fines against giant foreign companies. When dictatorships like Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba and other countries engage in egregious evil and attacks against America or their own citizens, the United States will frequently freeze or seize some or all of their bank assets for a time, perhaps even permanently.

2) A nation can fund the opponents of an enemy nation, which is a kind of proxy war. China and Russia frequently fund enemies of America, such as Cuba and Venezuela recently. Iran also funds and guides Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis to engage in low-level war against Israel or the West.

3) A nation can secretly sabotage, or stage terror attacks, against its enemies. Iran routinely attacks Western computers in cyber warfare, and plants hidden roadside bombs, as well as blows up cafes, restaurants, hotels, airports, and embassies of Western nations. Israel, in turn, selectively assassinates the terror leaders and scientists of its enemies.

4) A nation can openly decapitate the leaders of its enemies by capturing or killing them, as America recently did to Venezuela’s dictator Nicolás Maduro, or Israel did to many political, military, police, and religious leaders in Iran.

5) A nation can disarm its enemy by targeting its military bases, planes, ships, vehicles, missiles, weapons, soldiers, etc. as Israel and America did to Iran in early 2026. Going to level 4 or 5 alone may be enough to overthrow an evil slave state and spare the suffering population, altho it hasn’t worked so far in Iran.

6) A nation can impoverish or devastate its enemy by attacking its industry and infrastructure, as both sides did to each other in World War II. This can be described as obliteration, “flattening them”, or “bombing them back into the Stone Age”.

7) A nation can slaughter the general population and “innocent civilians” of its enemy by killing a large number of them. This can harm them economically, weaken them militarily, and break their spirit and will to fight. Both sides did this in WW II. Russia is currently doing this to Ukraine, but not the reverse.

8) A nation can conquer some or all of another nation’s territory and then annex it to its own. China did this to East Turkestan and Tibet in the 1950s.

9) A nation can annihilate its enemy by killing an extreme amount of its people and not allowing its government to remain in existence. The Babylonians, Medes, Scythians, and others did this to their enemy Assyria in 612-609 BC, as did Rome to Carthage in 146 BC. This level of war is rare today, altho tribal societies with minimal contact with the West still did this a century or two ago. The defeated enemy tribe usually still had some people left, but it was essentially erased from history. The modern tendency is to fully terminate them by seizing the enemy population and forcibly integrating them into their nation as a kind of war prize.

*  *  *

Each selected type of warfare tends to involve most or all of those levels above it. If a certain strategy of attack doesn’t achieve the desired result, the war can be escalated until the proper outcome or victory is secured.

War is never really serious until you get to level 6 or 7. Less than that is just a kind of punishment, reproof, or skirmish. Ever since World War II, America and the West haven’t really gone to level 6 or 7. They lack the intellectual understanding and moral confidence to do so. Hence, they never really try to win their wars. So they don’t.

America and Britain conquered Germany and Japan in 1945, and then rewrote their constitutions, and thus converted them to Western liberalism and semi-freedom. This was a true victory.

But this strategy and technique hasn’t been used since then. It wasn’t used with 1950s Korea, 1960s Vietnam, 1990s Kuwait, 2000s Iraq, 2000s Afghanistan, or 2026 Iran. Hence, America lost all those wars. The most that can be said is half of Korea, on its own, struggled its way to Western liberalism and semi-freedom by the 1980s or so. All the other nations are still savage tyrannies and America’s enemy. Despite immense military, civilizational, and moral superiority, America didn’t think it had the right to win, and it didn’t.

To protect itself and live safely, American wars need to go to at least levels 6 or 7. This generates a good possibility of winning, and of converting of its enemies to Western liberal philosophy and political semi-liberty. Or America needs to go to level 8, and take some or all of the enemy's territory as a legitimate and worthy war prize. This practice also vastly discourages future enemies from emerging.

But America is a hugely self-hating and self-destroying nation which mostly opposes its own philosophy and culture of Western liberalism and political freedom. This lack of intellectual understanding and moral self-confidence stymies escalation to levels 6, 7, or 8, and thus prevents all future American victories in war.

Beloved Fascism

 

There are four main evil political philosophies in the world today: socialism, fascism, sharia, and wokeism. But only three of them have organizations and advocates. Fascism has no real organizations or advocates, but is instead the universal political philosophy. Everyone loves it.

Fascism today is perhaps best defined as: “government control of society via coercion of personal and social behavior”. Essentially everybody today favors this. Even political conservatism – which is really bad, but possibly not “evil” – favors fascism such as coercion in behavior regarding drugs, prostitution, gambling, and early abortion. Conservatism today even mostly favors government control of schools and news media. And virtually everyone today – socialists, mozlems, wokesters, and conservatives – favors coercing people into paying for government health care, education, transportation, housing, and food. These five are all seen today as “basic government services” or even “entitlements” which all people should be forced into funding.

The basic idea here is government makes people good, and makes life better, thru tyranny. Government coerces us “for our own good” and “for the greater good” – and is generally successful at this.

Such is the beauty of fascism. Such is the wonder and bliss of government coercion and tyranny over people’s private and social activity. Fascism eliminates most of the evils of individual rights and liberty in which various person harm themselves and their fellows via their expression of freedom of thought, speech, and behavior. People make mistakes in their life but fascist coercion corrects this.

Fascism today highly monitors, controls, and restricts individual liberty and the rights of man. It does so in the name of “the common good” as well as the nanny state improvement and uplifting of all the different individual persons and their various groups. Virtually everyone today – socialists, mozlems, wokesters, and conservatives – agrees that high-level fascism is a good thing.