Social Justice

 

"Social justice" is unjust. It's bigotry against whites and males. It's minority supremacism. It privileges unworthy and inferior blacks, Hispanics, women, homosexuals, transsexuals, Moslems, foreigners, and others over high-achieving and meritorious whites and males. It's a system of power, oppression, and criminality which abuses and marginalizes suffering and defenseless white people and male persons. It's a political philosophy and socio-economic system of immorality and injustice which vilifies and demonizes whites and males in society, and which discriminates against and violates their rights. "Social justice" is systemic depravity and tyranny against innocent, good, worthy, noble, and superior whites and males.

The Sounds of Silence

 

This is a sissyboy-faggot world. Every adult on Earth is a pussy. It's been this way at least since reason came around. And almost certainly it’s been true since mankind fully developed, 30,000 to 40,000 years ago.

I tend to seek the truth ferociously. One result of this is I write radical things on important topics almost non-stop. Pretty much the only appropriate reactions to them are furious disagreement or thunderous applause. Yet virtually the only response I ever get in real life is...dead silence.

No-one dares to breathe a word. They don't agree with me. They don’t disagree with me. They don't say a single god-damned thing.

On the one hand, no matter how much they agree with me, they don't want to voice their assent to my new and radical ideas because then, seemingly, pretty much everyone on the globe will hate their fucking guts. On the other hand, no matter how much they disagree with me, they don't want to express their dissent because then, seemingly, I’ll skin them alive. People also don't care to utter a single negative word because they usually have little logic to back their conventional beliefs and my arguments generally seem powerful or unanswerable.

Of course, people may find my radical ideas so outlandish to publicly profess that they find me crazy as a person – and thus not worth arguing with. They could also consider me to be a dangerous lunatic – and thus unwise to provoke. Ultimately, I find this display, of intellectual and personal weakness and cowardice, contemptible and disgusting.

The way things generally happen is: I work on an important issue or problem, try to figure it out, publish my determinations, people read it, and then slimy, pathetic humanity says nothing. As already stated, the almost invariable reply to my reasoning and conclusions is...dead silence.

What a way for mankind to advance and me to improve my thinking!

In the end, whenever a howl and scream of agreement or disputement is demanded and inescapable, people find it safer and wiser to say nothing. It’s a complete evasion of the debate and controversy. People think: Best to have no reaction at all!

Thus the ideal response to my writing these days is pure sissyboy-faggotry. After all, this is a planet of weaklings, wimps, losers, failures, dirtbags, slimeballs, cowards, and pussies. Everyone except me.

The Nature of Man

 

95% of the progress in the world comes from men. About 95% of the ascent of man – of mankind's improvement in culture, civilization, quality of life, and personal happiness -- is the product of men, and not women. Virtually all the great creators, innovators, inventors, craftsmen, scientists, explorers, conquerors, artists, writers, philosophers, politicians, organizers, leaders, and businessmen are men, both today and always. Homer, Aeschylus, Socrates, Aristotle, Euclid, Archimedes, Cicero, Horace, Aurelius, Michelangelo, Leonardo, Erasmus, Grotius, Rabelais, Montaigne, Bayle, Galileo, Bacon, Locke, Smith, Voltaire, Diderot, Franklin, Jefferson, Edison, Einstein, Asimov, Jobs, Gates, and Musk have virtually no female equivalents. And what little women do contribute to the life of the planet is more than offset by their general conservatism and resistance to progress. And especially by their serious parasitism and predation upon men.

Women are practically worthless! And this is on their good day. Mostly they drive the world backwards and over the cliff. Altho they're good for sex, there's hardly a single foolish and depraved philosophical, cultural, and political organization or movement that they don't join with enthusiasm and then slavishly serve. And altho they're rarely the leaders, they're usually the glue that holds the evil organizations and movements together and that make them go. The ideals of religion, socialism, and self-sacrifice come to mind. In good organizations and movements, of course, women are largely absent.

Women have been especially evil and harmful to the planet since about 1965 and the New Left. And even worse since about 2015 and the Woke Left. So it's especially galling to hear the dominant egalitarian and feminist "thinkers" of today proclaim the inherent and inescapable rottenness and "toxicity" of men while promoting the natural and undeniable sweetness and "godliness" of women. What claims could be more absurd? What could be more false and wicked?

People need to learn the facts about men and women. They need to understand their actual natures and nurtures. Western society today would be far better off if we could get closer to the truth about the two genders.

Differentialism

 

Whites and blacks, men and women, heteros and homos all differ intellectually, morally, and psycho-spiritually. Also culturally and volitionally. Whites, men, male heterosexuals, and female homosexuals are all superior to their counterparts. Blacks, women, male homos, and female heteros are more like animals, relative to their rivals.

Everybody today can observe the differences in the various tribes of mankind. But virtually everyone in the West these days is partially or fully Woke. This includes virtually all neo-liberals. So people nowadays almost always attribute the observable superiority of whites, men, male heteros, and lesbians to societal bigotry. However, no-one can plausibly locate this in the culture; virtually all the evidence of the past 60 years points toward bigotry of the opposite kind. So people today attribute this mostly "minority" inferiority to secret, hidden, institutional, or systemic bigotry.

The philosophy of Wokism essentially denies nature and nurture. It generally rejects science and truth. Wokism says the natural differences in the various human groups in intellect, morality, and psycho-spirituality are all unreal. It claims the nurtural differences in culture/upbringing and volition/free-will are similarly non-existent. Wokism states minorities are not children of a lesser god. Indeed, just the opposite.

Generally speaking, Wokism claims the many races, genders, and sexualities are the same in ways they're clearly different. It says they're different in ways they're clearly the same. In philosophy, culture, sociology, and politics, Wokism denies the "universal man" standard and universal values. It rejects the historical Enlightenment and avant-garde liberalism.