Original Sinners

 

Humans are fundamentally depraved. They’re biologically and genetically defective on a profound level. People are dedicated to self-destruction and social destruction. And they’re quite effective at it. In many respects it’s a wonder they’re still even around.

But humans aren’t fully evil. The proof of this is humans are the dominant life form on the planet and they haven’t annihilated themselves yet. This doesn’t mean Big Brother, nuclear war, bio-chemical war, and extinction don’t loom. But they may well be avoided and defeated.

And even amidst loathsome mankind, living as a hermit isn’t good. Isolated mountains, woods, deserts, islands, and farms have a lot of appeal – especially with dogs and cats. But humans today have a lot to offer in the way of wealth, health care, technology, and culture. For all their wretched, disgusting, and absurd nature – for all their commitment to a lifestyle of irrationality, immorality, injustice, and betrayal – people still have by far the highest intelligence and knowledge of any creature on Earth. And they have the best esthetics and spirituality by a mile. So until decent android companions are built – especially female sex robots – the tiny number of relatively good and civilized people on this planet probably need to try hard to get along with their inferior insectoid monstrous fellow man.

Not For You

 

Liberalism is a systematic and comprehensive thought-system which highly accurately describes and explains the fundamental nature of reality, life, society, and Self. The philosophy of liberalism also delineates the most effective way to deal with them. Liberalism reveals to the individual how best to understand, manipulate, exploit, and enjoy reality; and how to optimally preserve, extend, and enhance his life. This philosophy also explains the ideal way to organize, harmonize and elevate society; finally, it tells the Sacred Self the most efficacious way to accomplish things, become great, experience pleasure, and be happy. It’s a magnificent system of ideas – the best ever created.

And in so many ways people don’t deserve it. However much all adults today suffered terribly in their childhood – and had their idealism stripped away and spirit crushed – due to a merciless upbringing of irrationality and injustice; now as free, independent, competently-functioning adults, they evidently have full control over their lives. And yet they still seem like deliberate and willful vermin. They evidently freely choose to reject most elements of liberal theory and live like hell. They seem to freely and purposely choose to waste and ruin their lives, and to abuse, attack, and betray their fellows. So the thought-system of liberalism seems too good for them. In fact, way too good.

People deserve Jesus and Marx. That’s pretty much all they’re good for. These are the only thinkers and philosophers they’re worthy of. Maybe throw in Berkeley, Hume, Kant, and Hegel.

Mankind is scum. People deserve to live like monkeys and monsters. Like fools and insects. Pain, suffering, and misery are their proper lot. Human beings merit no better. In fact, even ideologies like the above seem too good for them. Maybe try Mohammad and Mao.

The Catastrophe of 1868

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was outrageous and a disaster for America. It degraded and harmed the nation to an incredible degree. And America has never recovered from this abomination.

Yes, almost everyone in the country agreed that blacks -- after the Civil War ended in 1865 -- had the right to be free. But these backward and savage peoples had no right to live here – and far less to become citizens.

When the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, America was a radically pro-reason, pro-individualism, pro-liberty, pro-Enlightenment nation. Blacks profoundly opposed all of that. America back them was a fundamentally virtuous, hard-working, law-abiding, well-educated, English common law-based, Anglo-Saxon cultured, high-quality, civilized, noble country. Blacks were none of that. To allow these aliens, hostiles, and natural enemies of White and Western Civilization to stay inside the country, and even become citizens, was absurd and horrendous. This was treason and suicide for the Whites and America.

The undeniable truth is that blacks after the Civil War were just like blacks today: an extremely criminal and mendicant race of remarkable low sophistication, socialization, character, and virtue. Their intellectual, moral, and spiritual inferiority degraded the culture and quality of life profoundly. Blacks then – as now – hated political liberty, high civilization, and White society. And they were fundamentally unsuited to all three.

* * *

In the direct aftermath of the war, Senator Garrett Davis of Kentucky observed: “The Negro may be free, but he is not fit to be a citizen among us.” Congressman Samuel Randall of Pennsylvania noted: “Freedom does not make the Negro a citizen. He is unprepared for the ballot and unfit for political power.” The undeniable truth was, and is, as Senator William Saulsbury of Delaware pointed out: “You may free them, but you cannot make them equals in this Republic.”

It’s worth remembering that under all immigration and naturalization laws and standards in American history – at least until the 1965 nightmare of Hart-Celler – blacks were not in the least qualified to immigrate here or become rights-bearing citizens. Indeed, many Whites – such as from eastern and southern Europe – were also unqualified to reside inside or undergo naturalization.

In discussing and debating post-war Reconstruction policy, Congressman Andrew Rogers of New Jersey declared: “The Negro is not a citizen and never was. Freedom does not confer political rights.” Senator Thomas Hendricks of Indiana stated the obvious: “The Negro race is incapable of citizenship. Freedom is one thing; political equality is another.”

The inferiority of blacks to Whites was unambiguous and manifest to all, both then and now. Senator James Doolittle of Wisconsin put it simply: “Let him be free, but let him be removed from among us, for the races cannot live together in equality.” Nor in decent cooperation and harmony.

These truths were crystal clear in 1866, when all the above statements were made. They’re clear now too. With few exceptions, blacks have no right to live in America, and still less to become citizens, for the overwhelming reasons already stated, and because they hate Western Civilization, America, Enlightenment philosophy, political liberty, and White people. And because their menacing, disgusting, vile, monkey presence radically degrades American culture and quality of life.

Birthday 250

The main reason America declared independence 250 years ago is simple: no-one was going to deprive an Englishman of his rights – not even another Englishman. But there were other reasons too.

When Britain and America fought the French and Indians from 1754 to 1763, the soldiers of both nations were amazed, and even appalled, at how different they were. The two tribes had grown apart considerably since Jamestown and 1606.

Some of this was due to extreme geographical distance, as well as the much more pioneering, adventurous, and ambitious spirit of the colonists. Additionally, America had developed her nation and culture over a period of 150 years while free from powerful monarchy-based Royals and established-church Priests. So the separation of classes in the colonies was a small fraction of that of the United Kingdom. Moreover, Britain’s frankly-admitted policy of mercantilism – where the mother-country explicitly exploited, and benefited at the expense of, the 13 colonies – was increasingly resented and viewed as unjust and unnatural.

After the war ended, from the years 1763 to 1775, the British Parliament initiated something new and unwelcome. They passed a slew of tyrannical laws which enraged and alienated the Americans. Altho these measures often seemed reasonable and moderate to the British, in fact, they were not.

America joined the French and Indian War mainly to gain access to the farmland and resources across the Appalachian Mountains, but without being attacked by any Frenchmen or Indians. When Britain won the war and then legally forbade this in late 1763 the colonists were stunned. They felt betrayed and oppressed – and started to think in completely new ways. When Britain passed many other unprecedented and dictatorial acts, culminating in the 1774 openly-named Coercive Acts, that was that. The War for Independence was inevitable.

It needs to be noted that from 1763 to 1776 – and then to 1792 or so – America was an absolute intellectual ferment. The 13 North American colonies debated politics, and even philosophy, with a passion, and in a manner, previously unknown to man. And they drew conclusions of a similar type. As John Adams noted in a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1815, most of the American Revolution took place in the minds of Americans well before the War for Independence began.

One giant determination the outraged colonists made from 1763 to 1776 was: “Enough is enough.” There was no chance in hell the Americans would bow down to “taxation without representation”. Nor any form of British taxation. Nor any form of legislation by these absolute foreigners.

If America hadn’t declared independence in 1776, she would have done so in five or ten years maximum. If America had lost the War for Independence, she would have declared a second war in five or ten years maximum. Independence was a foregone conclusion by the late 1774 First Continental Congress in Philadelphia.

The bottom line was simple: no-one was going to deny an Englishman his rights – especially not a super-powered Englishman who understood, and believed in, liberty and the rights of man far better than just 14 years before.

Battle Royale

Ever since reason was discovered and invented in about 585 B.C. – that is, ever since strictly logical thought was successfully isolated from emotions, desires, drives, and instincts – the world has been a battleground between the forces of rationality and irrationality. This means an intellectual, psychological, legal, military, and otherwise war between those who search for, and obey, reason; and those who blithely ignore or brazenly reject it. This is the purest version of the eternal clash between good and evil.

This seminal reason vs. unreason philosophical conflict manifests itself culturally and societally in a battle between liberalism and illiberalism. This means the ideals of (1) realism, (2) rationality, (3) individualism, (4) liberty, (5) heroism, and (6) triumph; vs. the ideals of (1) subrealism and superrealism, (2) religion and nihilism, (3) altruism and collectivism, (4) fascism and socialism, (5) apathy and passivity, and (6) surrender and defeatism. This fundamental battle can also be described as the thought-system of straight-wing liberalism vs. that of right-wing reactionism and left-wing regressivism. This means: the magnificent ideology of progress and ascent vs. the ideology of a weak, sad, barbarous status quo vs. the ideology of a weaker and sadder retreat into even worse barbarism.

Clearly the Holy Individual and his derivative, supportive society needs to be as rational and liberal as possible. This is the way to maximum personal greatness and happiness, plus maximum social harmony and prosperity. Selfish pleasure, culturalism richness, and the victory of man demand rationality and liberalism.