Today’s
Objectivists and libertarians are poor advocates for political
liberty. They have all the truth in the world on their side – but
they still lose pretty much every political argument. The world at
large does not come to them for answers.
Objectivists
and libertarians lose the debate because they rarely employ
principles or argue essentials. Thus they have a hard time cutting to
the chase or getting to the point – assuming they even know it.
When it comes to publicly discussing the nature and role of
government, Objectivists and libertarians focus on side-issues and
trivia.
Rather
than using their strongest weapon, and arguing the moral case
for political liberty, they almost always argue the practical one.
This strategy implies that virtue and idealism are on the other side,
and thus undercuts them drastically.
Part
of the reason Objectivists and libertarians shun moral discussion,
and the righteousness of individual liberty, is they’re generally
uncomfortable with philosophy and abstract theory. Hence their claims
are mostly devoid of intellectual rigor. They try to substitute for
this with sarcasm, personal bitterness, and insults to their
opponents. But serious political thinkers are not impressed.
Probably
the biggest reason Objectivists and libertarians can’t get across
the idea that freedom is 100% good in theory and 100% good in
practice – other than that they never mention it – is because
they hate being hated. They quietly know how radical they are, and
how much people are initially shocked and appalled at their theories, and so
they assiduously avoid stating them openly or clearly.
Objectivist
and libertarian revolutionaries understand how much the current
political world is dominated by right-wing conservatives and
left-wing progressives – and how much these two ideologies revile
genuine liberty, justice, capitalism, libertarianism, laissez-faire,
and individual rights. Hence they avoid mentioning them. Objectivists
and libertarians can ramble on in their inept arguments for a
thousand words without once mentioning them. To most people,
especially the Objectivists and libertarians themselves, it seems
like such a thing isn’t possible. But the next time you get half a
chance – go take a look!
Far
the most common technique the Objectivists and libertarians employ,
to gain popular acceptance and avoid public loathing, is to disguise themselves as conservatives. They argue – and even dress and look – just like them. They even force themselves to think
like them. The end result of all this dishonesty and cowardice is
that nowadays the Objectivists and libertarians very much are
conservatives, They’re widely and properly known as “people of
the right” and (in American terms) as supporters of the
Republicans.
All
this is just too sad and pitiful for words.
What
needs to happen, if the Objectivists and libertarians ever want to
win this intellectual battle and convince anyone of quality, is they
need to finally start telling the truth. They need to clearly
and emphatically admit that they reject conservatism and the
Republicans – not just progressivism and the Democrats. They need
to publicly confess that they favor complete freedom for every
individual and that thus they entirely oppose all government
intervention, interference, and force-initiation in human life
whatsoever.
Objectivists
and libertarians need to loudly, proudly, defiantly say: We reject
all vice laws, labor laws, professional licenses, and business
permits. We reject all government charity and redistribution
of wealth. We oppose all government streets, schools, parks,
banks, and money. We oppose and reject all personal, social,
and economic regulation whatsoever.
Moreover,
we Objectivists and libertarians think people have no right to
healthcare, education, housing – or even food and a “living
wage”. These are great values to human life, but the free
individual alone has the right and duty to seek them, and he by
himself can find them at far higher quality and far lower price than
with government “help” and as a “right”.
Objectivists
and libertarians should flatly state that government only
exists to protect people and property. Hence the only legitimate
government organizations are the police, military, courts, jails, and
a tiny overseeing administration. Moreover they should state that
taxation is theft, and thus the tiny amount of money needed to fund
the government should be entirely voluntary and contractual.
Of
course, the politically-pitiful Objectivists and libertarians can’t
really say the stuff above if they don’t understand and believe it.
And that’s the point. They don’t.
So,
in simple terms, why are the Objectivists and libertarians so
terrible when it comes to advocating political liberty?
First,
they’re wildly incompetent. Next, they’re profoundly
dishonest. Finally, they’re extremely cowardly.
So
the current prospects for political liberty on this planet are poor. With friends of freedom like the Objectivists and libertarians,
who needs enemies?