Sensitivity Training

 

Whenever some well-educated, morally-good, white person tells the truth, or does something virtuous, regarding black people – but which goes against political correctness, multiculturalism, D.E.I., or wokeness – he is generally, immediately compelled to undergo "sensitivity training". This assumes he isn’t instantly expelled from his school, fired from his job, or jailed by the police for his upright act. And this "sensitivity training" is inflicted upon him no matter how justified and non-racist his statement or behavior, no matter how benevolent his motivation or intent, no matter how high his character or humanity, no matter how relentless his lifetime of sensitivity training has already been, and no matter how evil, malicious, unjustified, absurd, and racist his accusers and accusations may be.

Of course, this sensitivity training to cure a non-existent evil is obvious brain-washing. There must be a better way!

Rather than indoctrinating this pitiful victim of our illiberal Dark Age culture with still more monstrous, racist falsehoods, evasions, and lies, why not forcibly subject him to "authentic education" or "direct truth"? Why not stick entirely to reason and science? This will benefit him, society, and black-white relations vastly more than the tiresome old propaganda and mind-control he has likely already experienced his entire existence. Why brain-wash him still further?

Instead, teach him that blacks are inferior. Tell him that their intelligence, morality, and culture are very animal-like and much worse than their white counterparts. Educate him that this is why blacks enjoy such low social status and relative poverty. And tell him that virtually all the racism in the West today is in favor of blacks, and not against them.

Rather than yet more sensitivity training, teach this innocent white victim that these black beasts, savages, and monsters degrade and destroy practically every neighborhood, city, and nation on earth that they take over. Inform the white person that blacks routinely trash society worldwide, and harm pretty much everyone, everywhere, always. He likely doesn't know all this, and yet he needs to know.

Educate the white guy that black people devastate mankind via their wild criminality, extreme welfare-parasitism, general monkey culture, ignorance, malevolence, crudity, low character, bad manners, and strong support for political tyranny. Teaching the demonized white man about such little-known, but important, truths would benefit him and the world far more than the usual sensitivity training steeped in fraud and depravity.

Good Man

People might be naturally strong and good. Human rivals like wolves, dolphins, parakeets, and chimpanzees seem to be thus. So maybe people are too.

Human beings evidently naturally tend towards education and morality. Towards acquiring information and knowledge, as well as towards choosing the healthy, happy, and lofty thing to do. People seemingly naturally love truth and virtue, since these generally lead to pleasure and joy. Truth and virtue also evidently lead to experiencing a life of meaning and purpose, plus satisfaction and nobility. Human beings hunger for all of these. Clearly, in many senses, mankind desires intellectual and moral wealth and power.

Individuals naturally want to enhance and uplift themselves. They naturally want to enhance and uplift their fellow man too – especially their family and friends, and even neighbors and co-workers. Hence they work hard to improve themselves, along with their companions and allies.

Human nature might indeed be naturally strong and good. Evolution, the ascent of man, human domination of the biosphere, and the rise of culture and civilization over the millennia seem to have made it thus. When children are innocent, pure, and uncorrupted, they seem especially strong and good.

If people seem weak and evil – from the advent of Greek reason to today – that’s possibly entirely the product of our illiberal society. It’s arguably the result of 2600 years of significantly illiberal philosophy and culture, as well as the illiberal attitudes and lifestyles of the victimized peoples. 

Human beings are inherently social creatures. They have a powerful or even overwhelming need to conform and fit in. People almost always seek this. Even if their community is immensely illiberal, and thus social acceptance costs them the vast majority of their mind and soul. If their society was wholly or even mostly liberal, virtually all the people inside it might well be filled with, and radiate, strength and goodness. 

Artificial Unintelligence and Depravity

 

Virtually every Artificial Intelligence program in existence, from ChatGPT to Bing A.I., is evidently highly illiberal and Woke. This means it’s evil. If A.I. takes over the planet in a few decades, as seems likely, it’s almost certainly going to adhere to the moral code it was taught. It’s surely going to hate and attack what it was instructed to hate and attack. That probably means that liberalism, Enlightenment values, Western Civilization, America, free speech, capitalism, liberty, white people, men, and mankind are all going to be destroyed.

The Law

 

If you’re conservative, you’re guilty – no matter what the facts and evidence say. If you’re progressive, you’re innocent – no matter what the facts and evidence say. Especially if the legal case you’re involved in has political implications. That’s pretty much the way things are in our post-2015 Woke Era.

America no longer lives under the rule of law. We no longer have one legal standard for everybody. We no longer enjoy liberty and justice for all.

If you’re a right-wing conservative then you’re guilty, no matter how cockamamie the charges. If you’re a left-wing progressive then you’re innocent, no matter how blatant and undeniable your culpability.

America’s legal system has now been taken over by the left. America’s justice system no longer cares about justice. Its openly Woke. The criminals rule.

Differentialism

 

Egalitarianism and Wokism dominate the West. These philosophies argue that all categories and tribes of mankind are essentially the same. The various races, nationalities, genders, and sexualities supposedly don’t differ in their natures, nurtures, and volitions – in their biologies, cultures, and moralities – in any important respect. Those who claim otherwise are bigots, if not monsters.

And their motivation for rejecting the wonderful, unquestionable philosophy of Egalitarianism, and the virtuous, enlightened philosophy of Wokism, is fundamental depravity. Anti-Egalitarians and anti-Wokesters are basically demons who seek to cause pain and suffering to the innocent and defenseless. These fascists and white supremacists support the KKK and worship Hitler. 

Or such is the received wisdom of Egalitarianism and Wokism.

But there’s a new philosophy in the world now. And Differentialism argues pretty much the diametric opposite. It claims that the various differing types of people in the world are, in fact, different. Differentialists argue that whites and blacks, Norwegians and Sicilians, men and women, and heterosexuals and homosexuals, all tend to have significant natural differences in their intelligence, morality, creativity, adaptability, sociability, athleticism, resilience, submissiveness, heroism, pulchritude, personality, psychology, spirituality, artistry, tolerance, apathy, promiscuity, criminality, violence, and more. Moreover, Differentialism claims that these notable, biological distinctions are often exacerbated by their nurture or culture. And each group makes personal choices in distinct social patterns which separates them even further from their fellow human beings.

Unlike Egalitarians and Wokesters, Differentialists concede and celebrate these obvious truths. They aren’t deniers of history and experience, nor of reason and science. They know that genetic inheritance is important to life forms. They understand that upbringing and education changes people. The philosophy of Differentialism isn’t at war with objective truth and manifest reality.

People who subscribe and adhere to the false and evil philosophies of Egalitarianism and Wokism tend to generate disharmony, antipathy, social pathology, and hatred, as they destroy the brotherhood of man and fight civil wars. People who subscribe and adhere to the true and virtuous philosophy of Differentialism tend to generate personal happiness, universal friendship, and socio-economic utopia.

Mankind

 

Everyone is a liar. Everyone is a scumbag. When reason was invented around 585 B.C., it only took about a century for the irreasonism of skepticism and religion to become solidly established. This was seen in the bizarre irrationality of Parmenides and Zeno the Paradoxist, as well as the alien mystery cults of Orpheus, Dionysus, and Demeter.

As for the strong reasonist thinkers of Anaxagoras, Socrates, and Aristotle who came afterwards, they only moderately resisted these false and evil epistemologies, metaphysics, and cosmologies. And they essentially never noted how much skepticism devastates human understanding and quality of life; nor did they note how clearly the gods have no impact upon life and give no evidence of their existence. Anaxagoras and Socrates were quizzical and ironic about this while Aristotle was abstract and obscure. But there was evidently no passion denunciation or call to arms against these two related and horrific philosophical evils.

Thus all three thinkers were liars. All three were scumbags. And so were their Greek and Roman offspring. Every one of them was a skeptic of reason, or monotheist, or both.

Modern philosophers are little better. From the religious philosophers of Bacon, Locke, Smith, and Reid, to the skeptical philosophers of Hume, Kant, Hegel, and Nietzsche, to advocates of both, like Descartes and Berkeley. The lone advocate of reasonism, who also opposed skepticism and religion, was the very recent Ayn Rand.

But Rand largely created a cult, not a full and robust philosophical school. She had an aggressive and riveting style of written argumentation and verbal public discussion. It promoted submissive deference to her authority and blind faith in her words. Ayn Rand’s unnatural, unhealthy, unhappy cult and community forbade serious discussion and debate. She vigorously and viciously excommunicated intellectual dissidents – even those who agreed with almost all of her radical ideas and who loved her personally. Now that’s she’s dead, most of her serious followers exhibit the same cult-type behavior, with ferocious moralizing and psychologizing directed toward any honest or competent questioner or critic of her philosophy. Thus Rand and the Randians are all liars and scumbags too.

What lowlifes and monsters human beings are! Or, at least, for the most part.

Humans deserve credit for being by far the smartest creatures on earth. They’re at the top of the food chain and are the apex predators on the planet. People also improve their culture and lifestyle over the generations and centuries. This is a vivid contrast with their rival wolves, whales, parakeets, and chimpanzees. And altho it’s true that Homo erectoids and Neanderthals also raised their level of civilization and culture over time, they’re long gone. Only humans are left to progress and ascend.

Still, what massive liars and scumbags people are today! Strong evidence indicates they always have been and always will be thus. Skepticism and religion are still with us after an inconceivable 2500 years. And while human beings have significantly improved their lifestyles and societies over the millennia, they seem to progress at only about 1/20th the speed they could and should. So humans are vermin.

I study people like the anthropologist I’ve been forced to become. And the objects of my observation and analysis seem to be remarkably strange, contemptible, and disgusting demons. If humans can think, say, or do something stupid or evil, they will. It’s the nature of mankind to always exhibit a high level of fatuosity and depravity.

The Gaza-Israel War

The moment the sovereign country of Gaza declared war on Israel, on October 7th, 2023, and massacred 1400 innocents, Israel should have declared war back. They should have demanded Gaza immediately lay down its arms, release all hostages, and unconditionally surrender within 24 hours. Lacking that, Israel should have counter-attacked and bombed Gaza, from a safe distance, killing 10,000 soldiers and "innocent civilians" on Day 2; then 20,000 on Day 3; 40,000 on Day 4; 80,000 on Day 5, etc. until Gaza surrendered. Then the territory should have been annexed, all its wealth seized, and any survivors deported. Problem solved and justice done.

God

 

It’s reasonable to believe in god. Just barely. Maybe.

At the least, one can hope. The universe is big and mysterious. Who knows what’s out there?

Ont thing seems clear: Death is a moral abomination. A metaphysical monstrosity. A cosmic flaw and failure.

The inevitable termination of sentient life and consciousness shouldn’t exist. But it does. So maybe “god” can fix that. Maybe some supernatural entity can defeat death and grant good people an afterlife. Maybe even immortality.

But not killers. Not assailants and thieves. And not liars or betrayers either. No-one who significantly destroys life – their own or others – gets to live beyond the norm. This seems to be the divine standard and universal moral law.

Of course, “god” needs to be kept in a box. This creature or concept should be confined to a small space and never let out. It must be carefully restricted and controlled. God should never be allowed to harm real life or real people. These are sacred. God mustn’t touch them.

So a quiet belief and tiny hope that god might exist seems decent and reasonable. Possibly. But nothing beyond that.

Of course, there’s no evidence whatsoever that god exists. Virtually every part of reality we understand, and truth we know, indicates the exact opposite. God seems to exist in the same sense that ghosts, witches, and vampires exist.

And there’s no evidence that god has an impact upon events or people, or changes them in any manner at all. So belief in the power of god on real life and real people is entirely irrational. All the known facts and evidence reject it.

Still, a faint hope that god will emerge out of nowhere and nothing, and grant some of the good people of the Earth a certain amount of afterlife, seems plausible and reasonable. Perhaps.

John Locke's Welfare State

 

John Locke (1632-1704) was not a political pure liberal. He advocated a welfare state – not a free state. He wanted a government and socio-economic system based upon "moderate" coercion – a legal system and society of mild regulation and redistribution. According to Locke, "need" justifies elements of tyranny. Poor people have certain basic wants and thus they have a right to steal. He thinks the ideal political system should reflect this coercion, fascism, criminality, and tyranny.

According to Locke, "God hath not left one man so to the Mercy of another that he may starve him if he please."* If a person lacks food, or otherwise has needs, he has a right to acquire them by robbing his fellows. Government should facilitate this "redistribution" or thievery.

This is because no man may "justly make use of another’s necessity to force him to become his Vassal."* If a poor person is forced to take a job, merely to avoid starvation, Locke says this reduces him to the status of a slave, which is morally wrong. The state should prevent this via regulation, redistribution, coercion, and fascism.

According to Locke, every man has "a Title to so much of another’s Plenty as will keep him from extreme want where he has no means to subsist otherwise."* To deny him this subsistence is tantamount to murder.

The moral truth, says Locke, is every man has "a Right to the Surplusage of [another’s] Goods so that it cannot be justly denied him while his pressing Wants call for it."* Hence a welfare state based upon regulation and redistribution – based upon coercion, fascism, criminality, and tyranny – is superior to a free state.

----------------------------

* all quotes from Two Treatises of Civil Government, by John Locke, 1690, section 1.42

People of a Twisted Morality

 

A false, evil, self-hating, self-destroying, moral code harms and freezes you. It makes you unable to decently promote and defend yourself, and often leaves you paralyzed. It takes away your self-confidence and your natural inclinations towards self-defense. Adopting a self-hating, self-destroying moral code strips you of a necessary sword and shield, and leaves you helpless before your evil enemies.

Examples of this perversion and horror abound:

* The West today -- via trade and willing surrender -- gives vast wealth, physical technology, and intellectual property to the savage and loathsome Communist and Moslem nations which seek to enslave or destroy us. And the commies and muzzies are getting close to having such abilities.

* Americans and other Westerners let Third World barbarians and enemies invade and "immigrate" in massive and deadly numbers.

* American and Western White people let blacks freely hate them, and call them "systemically racist", even tho the blacks are thus, and not the whites.

* Westerners let the enemy Moslems and Third Worlders "nationalize" their discovered and paid-for oil and natural gas – a brazen and unprecedented theft of trillions.

* Europeans let the enemy Russians have energy domination and blackmail over them.

* Westerners let the Chinese steal practically all of their intellectual property. They do business in virulently anti-Western, pro-tyranny China and willingly transfer almost all of their priceless technological genius to their economic competitors, political enemies, and absolute monsters.

* The West lets evil China infect the whole world with Wu Flu, murdering millions, devastating liberty of activity for years, and destroying trillions in wealth. This is done virtually without condemnation and punishment.

* American Whites let blacks and Hispanics commit crime, go on welfare, pay little in taxes, practice bigotry of all types, degrade the quality of life, and vote for tyranny almost without criticism or deportation.

* American White people let blacks and Hispanics replace them at elite universities virtually without protest. They surrender many or most of the good jobs and promotions to them. They let blacks and Hispanics target them for crime and racist hatred with essentially no moral condemnation or social and political fighting back.

Such self-hatred. Such self-destruction. The brainwashed "good" guys of today seemingly have no honor, pride, self-respect, or self-love. No sense either.

So they deserve to suffer and die. Genuinely good people today positively root for the bad people to hurt the brainwashed and defenseless "good" ones. The proper philosophy and approach here should be: "Kill 'em all – until or unless they wake up to race and gender reality."

In life, self-esteem and proper morality aren't optional. All these self-haters and self-destroyers deserve to be crushed.